Brainwashing in Thailand



A PM in pink is doomed to be hurt by his defying act of not standing while others were singing a song praising the king and his royal family.

As the red-shirted protesters are gaining popularity, the royalists are also campaigning for the love for the monarch and the need to protect the monarchy.
So much has been done in Thailand to trigger hatred against the red-shirted Thais so that the Abhisit adminstration could one day rightfully kill the protesters in the name of the love for the monarch. This same brutal trick was observed during the October 6, 1976.

"Thai PM: 'willing to compromise' with protesters" --BBC

What is there to compromise?

Abhisit, coming into power via a militarily-supported shortcut, clearly is not accepted by a significant number of Thais across the country;

Abhisit cannot even stay in his own residence, nor can he visit 90% of the provinces in Thailand;

Abhisit's tyrannical deeds have led to over 20 lives and injuries of thousands; many more?

The majority of people could only be decided by voting, and that's exactly what Abhisit has been trying to avoid; What a cunning and shameless loser!

etc.

Read his lips and observe his body langauge in the clip linked from below. He is no longer good at lying.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/hardtalk/8648639.stm

It is sad to see Bangkok like this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8649652.stm

Civil Red-Shirted Protestors Giving Lessons to the Royalists

This has been a civil protest, and such civility has made the brutal forces by the royalists and military regime, in alliance with the Abhisit administration more evidently uncivilized, inhumane, and barbaric.



Photos: Credits to http://www.prachataiwebboard.com/webboard/id/40881


Look at the faces of the red-shirted freedom fighters above.
Then, look at the forces prepared to suppress and murder them:









PLEASE NOT THAT THE ABOVE PICTURES OF HEAVILY ARMED SOLIDERS HIDING WITH A FETAL INTENT HAVE BEEN ERASED FROM THE SERVER.... CENSORSHIP IN THAILAND HAS NEVER BEEN FIERCER THAN THIS TYRANNICAL ERA UNDER THE ABHISIT ADMINSTRATION.

Watch the 24/7 Live Broadcast of Red-Shirted Freedom Fighters

See for yourself who these people are, what they do, and whether they are violent.

http://thaitvnews.blogspot.com/2010/03/people-channel-live.html

At this minute, the Abhisit tyrannical government has again ordered the armed troops of soliders and police to kill these bare-handed peace lovers.

Strife in Thailand


Credit: Prachatai webboard

Strife in Thailand
Published: April 13 2010 20:33 | Last updated: April 13 2010 20:33
Financial Times

What little legitimacy the government of Abhisit Vejjajiva had is evaporating. Until blood was spilt on the streets of Bangkok last weekend, Mr Abhisit could at least claim that his administration was preparing for a peaceful resolution of Thailand’s long-festering political tensions. Now, with 21 people dead, with a discredited constitution still in place and with red-shirted protesters still feeling disenfranchised, that claim looks increasingly thin. What is more, the situation could deteriorate further. The red-shirted supporters of Thaksin Shinawatra, ousted from power in a 2006 coup d’etat, have hardened their negotiating stance. The danger is of worse clashes and an escalating death toll.

That is a tragedy Thailand can, and must, avoid. The army must resist any temptation to do what it has done too many times before: resolve democratic strife through military intervention. Mr Abhisit should call an election as quickly as possible. He must do so knowing full well that his chances of winning are slim. Victory is more likely to go to parties aligned with Mr Thaksin, whose deeply flawed premiership nevertheless revolutionised Thai politics by enfranchising the poor from the north and north-east. That genie cannot be put back in the bottle.
Thailand’s deep political rift will be extremely difficult to heal. The red-shirts must play a part by assuring the government that free and fair elections are possible. Mr Abhisit has spoken – with some justification – of a climate of fear that makes it difficult for pro-government politicians to campaign in red-shirt strongholds. If the opposition is willing to create the climate for smooth elections, Thailand’s more conservative forces must be prepared to abide by the results.

The king could help by calling for all Thai’s to accept the will of the majority. After Mr Thaksin was removed by military force, two prime ministers loyal to him were ousted by what appeared to be a selective application of the constitution. That sense of arbitrariness must end. If Thais can move beyond a colour-coded schism that has seen politics fought on the streets, they might just discover there are as many things that unite as divide them. If they cannot, the future for Thailand looks bleak indeed.

>กรีนแลนด์ในสมการความมั่นคงโลก (2026): มุมมองเชิงวิชาการจากฝ่ายอเมริกันเพื่อ “ป้องกันสงครามใหญ่”

กรีนแลนด์ในสมการความมั่นคงโลก (2026): มุมมองเชิงวิชาการจากฝ่ายอเมริกันเพื่อ “ป้องกันสงครามใหญ่” กรีนแลนด์ในสมการความมั่น...